Jump to content

Rule Update - Rushing The Passer


Guest

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  PFL Coach
  • Content Count:  3,707
  • Reputation:   374
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Timezone:  Europe/London

DONT UNDERSTAND IT LOST REALLY BUT PROB DONT COUNT AS I THE BLITZ BITCH :ohyeah:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Content Count:  2,790
  • Reputation:   200
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Timezone:  Europe/London

Good rule way to many cover plays going on imo. Very few people seem to blitz anymore

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Content Count:  1,383
  • Reputation:   98
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Timezone:  Europe/Dublin

Nothing that says you have to blitz, also nothing against using cover plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Content Count:  2,767
  • Reputation:   168
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Timezone:  Europe/London

Good rule way to many cover plays going on imo. Very few people seem to blitz anymore

this is because you dont run it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Content Count:  2,790
  • Reputation:   200
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Timezone:  Europe/London

this is because you dont run it!

I do run it just not very well

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Content Count:  2,767
  • Reputation:   168
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Timezone:  Europe/London

I do run it just not very well

ahah im going to look at the rushing attempts by both next time we play... can we break 10? :g:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anybody give me an example of a defensive play, other than nickel 9 Velcro, that has only two men rushing the passer and 9 dropping into coverage - whether that's man or zone or spy or contain? Because, for the life of me I cannot find one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Content Count:  2,767
  • Reputation:   168
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Timezone:  Europe/London

I think my point is there is 1 play that has this... Which is say 1 out of 100 defensive plays available.. So if it happens once a game thats fine.. Just not every play...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Content Count:  2,663
  • Reputation:   90
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Timezone:  Europe/London

I thought this rule was already in effect... :lol:

I'd also argue that Contains do help in Pass D, I've had a fair few INTs where my player in a Contain has picked off a Slant or Drag route. :up:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Content Count:  693
  • Reputation:   84
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Timezone:  UTC

I'd also suggest that contain is a nice way of taking away a screen

But that's a different conversation

I'm happy with whatever the admins decide

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Content Count:  1,849
  • Reputation:   317
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Timezone:  Europe/London

Contain is an interesting point whereas spy drops into coverage a contain will simulate a rush but will stay untill the qb moves out of pocket personally I hate mobile qb's but it makes playing offense easier

3 dt rush pass to flats 2dts rush look down field cos either s lb cb or safety is blitzing unless theres 4 dts

But I live with rule change

Edited by Reaper KH
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Content Count:  575
  • Reputation:   53
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Timezone:  Europe/London

Can anybody give me an example of a defensive play, other than nickel 9 Velcro, that has only two men rushing the passer and 9 dropping into coverage - whether that's man or zone or spy or contain? Because, for the life of me I cannot find one.

I think there may be a sugar cover 3 bluff that only has 2 rushers but i may be wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Content Count:  1,849
  • Reputation:   317
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Timezone:  Europe/London

I think there may be a sugar cover 3 bluff that only has 2 rushers but i may be wrong

No the lb's look like they are blitzing but go into zone theres still a 4 man rush Edited by Reaper KH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...